Re: PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU
Date: 2017-08-01 12:16:54
Message-ID: c28a28f9-94d3-9708-8ab6-e11190ac82a6@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/1/17 02:12, Victor Wagner wrote:
>> We are only calling uloc_toLanguageTag() with keyword/value
>> combinations that ICU itself previously told us were supported. So
>> just ignoring errors doesn't seem proper in this case.
>>
> We know that this version of ICU is broken. But what choice we have?

I don't know that we can already reach that conclusion. Maybe the APIs
have changed or we are not using them correctly. Are there any bug
reports or changelog entries related to this? I don't think we should
just give up and ignore errors.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Victor Wagner 2017-08-01 12:28:06 Re: PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-08-01 11:20:50 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers