Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date: 2018-01-02 15:47:17
Message-ID: c2128682-f9db-f94d-ac5f-ec13dd5f58a0@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Alvaro,

On 12/29/2017 12:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> This seems to work pretty well, much to my surprise. I was a bit scared
> of adding a new deptype, but actually the only affected code is
> findDependentObjects() and the semantics of the new type is a subset of
> the existing DEPTYPE_INTERNAL, so I think it's okay. I need to fill in
> its description in docs and comments though -- I left it out because the
> real difference between INTERNAL and INTERNAL_AUTO is not something that
> is covered by the existing description of INTERNAL, so maybe I'll need
> to expand that one.
>
> This version includes the fixes I posted as "delta" to the problems
> Jesper reported, as well as fixes to the ones reported by Amit. It's
> looking pretty good to me -- I'm seeing it as a candidate to commit
> early in the upcoming commitfest.
>

indexing.sql contains a \di command which list the owner of the db, so
make check-world fails.

Best regards,
Jesper

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-01-02 16:03:13 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Previous Message Jesper Pedersen 2018-01-02 15:44:20 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table