From: | Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Jun Cheol Gim <dialogbox(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] timestamp informations to pg_stat_statements |
Date: | 2016-07-17 23:43:32 |
Message-ID: | c124cfb7-a89a-322e-6809-a18066c87265@dalibo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 18/07/2016 01:06, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Jun Cheol Gim <dialogbox(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> If we have timestamp of first and last executed, we can easily gather thess
>> informations and there are tons of more use cases.
>
> -1 from me.
>
> I think that this is the job of a tool that aggregates things from
> pg_stat_statements. It's unfortunate that there isn't a good
> third-party tool that does that, but there is nothing that prevents
> it.
>
FWIW there's https://github.com/dalibo/powa-archivist which does that,
assuming you're using a 9.4+ server.
--
Julien Rouhaud
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-07-18 01:28:00 | Re: One process per session lack of sharing |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2016-07-17 23:35:10 | Re: DO with a large amount of statements get stuck with high memory consumption |