Good point... I'll try this
On 6/2/21 2:32 PM, Scott Ribe wrote:
>> On Jun 2, 2021, at 2:00 PM, <dave(at)davebolt(dot)co(dot)uk> <dave(at)davebolt(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
>>
>> For the other column I’m guessing more work has to be done finding the length for each row. Maybe maintaining a column containing the current length for each row would help?
> or a functional index
>