From: | "Ludovic Orban" <lorban(at)bitronix(dot)be> |
---|---|
To: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Kris Jurka" <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres XA support |
Date: | 2006-10-31 15:51:36 |
Message-ID: | c016d00b0610310751w3c9ce170y3296d83895565d4@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Heikki,
> > Weblogic's connection pool has a parameter called
> > local-transaction-supported which when set to false will disallow
> > local transactions to be executed on connections taken from that pool.
>
> The WebLogic manual isn't very helpful, this is all I found regarding
> that parameter:
>
> "local-transaction-supported — Optional. Boolean. Set the
> local-transaction-supported to true if the XA driver supports SQL with
> no global transaction; otherwise, set it to false. The default value is
> false."
>
> It doesn't actually say what difference it makes or why you would want
> to set it to true. I don't see how a transaction manager could generally
> make use of the feature, because it doesn't know if a transaction is
> distributed or not until it's committed or the second resource is enlisted.
It's not the transaction manager but the connection pool (this is a
parameter of the connection pool, not of the TM !) that is going to
use this feature. If it detects you're using a connection outside a
tm.begin() / tm.commit() block it will throw a SQLException.
To achieve this you need tight integration between the connection pool
and the TM but that's definitely possible. I think I should implement
that as well.
> > I guess you could enforce the same behavior in the driver by throwing
> > a SQLException when some query is executed and XAResource.start() has
> > not been called yet or XAResource.end() has already been called.
>
> That seems like the easiest solution. We'll have to wrap the Connection
> object returned by PGXAConnection.getConnection so we can intercept
> execute-calls, though.
That sounds good enough.
Cheers,
Ludovic
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-10-31 19:14:54 | Re: confused about transactions and connection pools |
Previous Message | Strong, David | 2006-10-31 15:47:58 | Re: jdbc driver performance TODO |