From: | "Ludovic Orban" <lorban(at)bitronix(dot)be> |
---|---|
To: | "Kris Jurka" <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres XA support |
Date: | 2006-10-31 10:24:36 |
Message-ID: | c016d00b0610310224j31896e60p896c2a999bfb58ba@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Kris,
2006/10/30, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>:
>
> I see how Allan's patch would get UPDATE 1 to commit, but UPDATE 2 and 3
> are the equivalent of an interleaved transaction and I don't see how that
> could possibly work. I'm not sure what sort of protection we need to add
> to prevent people from doing this or other transaction handling actions on
> the connection. Right now the Connection object doesn't know if it is
> being used by a XADatasource.
The problem is not if a connection was created by an XADatasource or
not but if it is being used in a global transaction context or not.
Weblogic's connection pool has a parameter called
local-transaction-supported which when set to false will disallow
local transactions to be executed on connections taken from that pool.
I guess you could enforce the same behavior in the driver by throwing
a SQLException when some query is executed and XAResource.start() has
not been called yet or XAResource.end() has already been called.
Ludovic
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Arthurs | 2006-10-31 10:45:00 | Re: Date time format out of range???? |
Previous Message | Luca Ferrari | 2006-10-31 10:18:55 | Date time format out of range???? |