| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in get_partition_for_tuple |
| Date: | 2017-03-28 00:57:09 |
| Message-ID: | c00d406a-24cc-4dec-ae59-a527b3ad6593@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/03/27 23:54, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> You're right, fixed that in the attached updated patch.
>>
>> Added this to the partitioning open items list, to avoid being forgotten
>> about.
>>
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_10_Open_Items#Partitioning
>
> Thanks for adding it there. I'm making a sweep through that list now,
> or at least the parts of it that obvious pertain to my commits. This
> patch looks good, so committed.
Thanks.
Regards,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-03-28 00:58:53 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clean up Perl code according to perlcritic |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-03-28 00:56:26 | Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT |