Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the

From: Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the
Date: 2003-11-19 17:16:56
Message-ID: bxyfzgknurb.fsf@datafix.cs.berkeley.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:

Robert> allowing indexes for searching nulls, or adding
Robert> concurrency to GIST, or allowing non btree indexes to

Oh this has come up before on -hackers and I've been meaning to chime
in.

Marcel Kornacker did implement concurrency for GiST - I confirmed as
much with Joe Hellerstein (his advisor). I know there's a paper he
wrote with C.Mohan on it. I don't know which version his
implementation was for.

--
Pip-pip
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-11-19 17:17:08 Re: Slashdot
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-19 16:34:30 Re: 7.4 not yet covered on /.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-19 17:18:00 Re: Build farm
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2003-11-19 17:15:28 Re: A big thanks to SuSE