Re: Maximum Possible Insert Performance?

From: William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Maximum Possible Insert Performance?
Date: 2003-11-24 17:45:22
Message-ID: bptg3i$64u$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus wrote:
> William,
>
>
>>When my current job batch is done, I'll save a copy of the dir and give
>>the WAL on ramdrive a test. And perhaps even buy a Sandisk at the local
>>store and run that through the hooper.
>
>
> We'll be interested in the results. The Sandisk won't be much of a
> performance test; last I checked, their access speed was about 1/2 that of a
> fast SCSI drive. But it could be a feasability test for the more expensive
> RAMdrive approach.
>

The SanDisks do seem a bit pokey at 16MBps. On the otherhand, you could
get 4 of these suckers, put them in a mega-RAID-0 stripe for 64MBps. You
shouldn't need to do mirroring with a solid state drive.

Time to Google up some more solid state drive vendors.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mallah 2003-11-24 18:04:06 Re: VACUUM problems with 7.4
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-24 17:44:30 Re: VACUUM problems with 7.4