Re: llvm dependency and space concerns

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: llvm dependency and space concerns
Date: 2025-01-12 00:03:43
Message-ID: boczjsrcsl2nptwpe2spjgpct6pqnytk4qlpum64f3xepswnpz@pk6a3ch2ckmz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2025-01-11 13:22:39 -0800, Jeremy Schneider wrote:
> It's a cleaner solution if JIT works more like an extension, and we can
> run a single build and split JIT into a separate package.

It does work like that. Only llvmjit.so has the llvm dependency, the main
postgres binary doesn't link to llvm. If llvmjit.so isn't available, jit is
silently disabled.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-01-12 00:11:14 Re: Possible integer overflow in bringetbitmap()
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2025-01-11 23:49:08 Re: Adjusting hash join memory limit to handle batch explosion