From: | list-pgsql-general(at)news(dot)cistron(dot)nl ("Miquel van Smoorenburg" ) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test |
Date: | 2003-10-31 10:51:18 |
Message-ID: | bnter5$730$1@news.cistron.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
In article <87n0blgs9g(dot)fsf(at)stark(dot)dyndns(dot)tv>,
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>Currently the linux-kernel folks are talking about how to integrate an IDE
>SYNC operation into the world. It looks like filesystems with journals will
>issue an IDE SYNC to checkpoint the journal, but it doesn't really look like
>they're planning to hook it into fsync unless people speak up and explain what
>databases need in that regard. However SYNC flushes the entire cache and means
>that all other writes are blocked until the SYNC completes.
>
>http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0304.1/0450.html
Also, if you're interested in this kind of stuff and what's going on
in the Linux kernel development circles, Google for "ide write barrier".
For example http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/10/13/87
Mike.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex | 2003-10-31 11:04:02 | ALTER Table |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2003-10-31 10:31:30 | Re: slow query performance |