| From: | Frank Seesink <frank(at)mail(dot)wvnet(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: "/usr/bin" supposed to exist? |
| Date: | 2003-10-07 02:55:48 |
| Message-ID: | blt9vr$r05$1@sea.gmane.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-cygwin |
stephan(dot)michael(dot)rupp(at)t-online(dot)de wrote:
> Hello, Frank,
>
>
...
>>Not sure, but this user may be experiencing the wonderful phantom
>>/usr/bin issue, where /usr/bin is there if you type a command like
>>
>> cd /usr/bin
>>
>>but if you type
>>
>> cd /usr
>> ls
>>
>>you don't see it.
>
>
> That's it exactly, Frank!
>
> Does this has any impacts on the functionality of CygWin/PostgreSQL (besides the fact
> that I don't s e e it...)?
Stephan,
As mentioned by Jason in another post, if you have /bin in your PATH,
odds are no, it will not affect things. However, you may wish to do as
I mentioned in my post just to 'restore' things to the way they should
be. In the end, /usr/bin is just a link to /bin anyway (take a look
from Windows Explorer and you'll see only C:\cygwin\bin exists, but
there's no C:\Cygwin\usr\bin), but it's nice to have things as most
Cygwin users/developers expect. ;-)
Not sure what causes this. My suspicion lies with something in the
Cygwin setup.exe's way of handling package updates (possibly the
post-install scripts?), as I've run into various minor (and some
not-so-minor) issues when doing updates.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jason Tishler | 2003-10-07 13:01:12 | Re: "/usr/bin" supposed to exist? |
| Previous Message | Frank Seesink | 2003-10-07 02:50:17 | Re: "/usr/bin" supposed to exist? |