Re: Functions have 32 args limt ???

From: "Ivar" <ivar(at)lumisoft(dot)ee>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Functions have 32 args limt ???
Date: 2003-08-28 09:04:56
Message-ID: bikgjn$gah$1@sea.gmane.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


How many reallife functions have avg. 5 params ?

Must see how are other servers, but MS SQL allow much more params than 32,
I'm also
sure that Oracle, Db2, ... all support more than 32 params.

"Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> wrote in message
news:86r836b8gf(dot)fsf(at)blue(dot)stonehenge(dot)com(dot)(dot)(dot)
> >>>>> "Ivar" == Ivar <ivar(at)lumisoft(dot)ee> writes:
>
> Ivar> I don't see why default is so small.
>
> Because any function with even 32 parameters has about 25 too many
> parameters.
>
> --
> Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777
0095
> <merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
> See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl
training!
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2003-08-28 09:05:31 Re: mysql to pgsqwl migration
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2003-08-28 09:04:13 Re: postgres vs mysql