Re: Persistent changes in rolled-back transactions

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Persistent changes in rolled-back transactions
Date: 2022-11-12 08:37:29
Message-ID: bffe5007-512b-fb4c-aafd-feb047b7fcf3@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On 11/11/22 17:18, Rui DeSousa wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 9, 2022, at 8:23 PM, David G. Johnston
>> <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Or just read the documentation for the current version (I seem to recall
>> it used to be non-transactional, maybe...doesn't matter now).
>
> In a lot of other databases DDL is not transactional and truncate is DDL —
> most likely confusing it with another RDBMS systems.

The first two RDBMS I dealt with had transactional DDL.  It's... /natural/,
given that table definitions reside in a system catalog that's just a bunch
of tables...  I was shocked to see how Oracle does it (and that they don't
have integers).

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rui DeSousa 2022-11-12 18:08:26 Re: How to test replication without doing a failover
Previous Message Edwin UY 2022-11-12 06:24:20 Re: How to test replication without doing a failover