From: | "Shoaib Mir" <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Shoaib Mir" <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Locking question? |
Date: | 2007-01-29 20:19:55 |
Message-ID: | bf54be870701291219l206cb980xd8d147bb90aa3fa6@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thank you Alvaro :)
-----------------
Shoaib Mir
EnterpriseDB (www.enterprisedb.com)
On 1/30/07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Shoaib Mir wrote:
> > While debugging an application, I just wanted to confirm from the list
> here:
> >
> > Suppose I have a long running transaction which has a few updates and
> > inserts running on some specific tables which means it has acquired
> > Exclusive locks too during the transaction on specific table but if just
> > before commit the client app crashes and the commit is never sent, will
> the
> > Exclusive locks be automatically released?
>
> Yes (assuming the backend dies in the process, which may not happen if
> the app dies silently and while not waiting for anything from the
> server).
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera
> http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-29 20:37:14 | Re: dependency ? |
Previous Message | shakahshakah@gmail.com | 2007-01-29 20:14:47 | Re: VACUUM ANALYZE taking a long time, %I/O and %CPU very low |