From: | "Shoaib Mir" <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 21 bit number for sequence |
Date: | 2006-04-15 08:11:49 |
Message-ID: | bf54be870604150111s28e0f0albb2a80a9813157a7@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Actually that is the application requirment to use 21 bit numbers as porting
it from Oracle where it used to work.
Yeah now i have decided to use a numeric data type in a table and use that
to write my own nextval and currval functions for that purpose.
Thanks for the help.
/Shoaib
On 4/15/06, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:52:49PM +0500, Shoaib Mir wrote:
> > Actually what i want to do is store 100000000000000100000 as the maximum
> > value in sequence. Is there a way for it ?
>
> Is that number in binary or decimal? In binary it's easy because it's
> only 1048608 decimal. In decimal it would require 66 bits, which
> doesn't fit. The is still: why do you want a *sequence* to go that
> high? A sequence starts counting a 1 and goes up until the limit. At
> one count per second you'd take several million million years to get
> though. Bigint indeed only goes upto 9223372036854775807.
>
> If you just want to store numbers, use numeric. Why do you want to
> combine numeric and a sequence?
> --
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for
> someone
> > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFEQKhuIB7bNG8LQkwRAkOpAJ0cRCABC2OmbDDVqNcPuAT0WjADdQCcDkGq
> dzC7ykqq/h6YhWpgDJIQ0kk=
> =YZzx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christian Kratzer | 2006-04-15 08:18:37 | Re: 21 bit number for sequence |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-04-15 08:01:50 | Re: 21 bit number for sequence |