Re: New buildfarm animals with FIPS mode enabled

From: Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: buildfarm(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Subject: Re: New buildfarm animals with FIPS mode enabled
Date: 2025-02-15 16:55:32
Message-ID: bf370df1-5524-4a87-8d14-b58aabf185d6@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Tom,

On 2/14/25 10:01 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I see that somebody decided to crank up some animals running
> RHEL8 and RHEL9 with FIPS mode turned on. The RHEL9 animals
> pass on v17 and master, but not older branches; the RHEL8
> animals pass nowhere. This is unsurprising given that the
> v17-era commits that allowed our regression tests to pass
> under FIPS mode (795592865 and a bunch of others) explicitly
> targeted only OpenSSL 3:
>
> These new expected files currently cover the FIPS mode provided by
> OpenSSL 3.x as well as the modified OpenSSL 3.x from Red Hat (e.g.,
> Fedora 38), but not the modified OpenSSL 1.x from Red Hat (e.g.,
> Fedora 35). (The latter will have some error message wording
> differences.)
>
> I'm kind of disinclined to do all the work that'd be needed to turn
> these animals completely green, especially when the reason to do it
> seems to be that someone decided we should without any community
> consultation. Perhaps others have different opinions though.

That's my fault. I did a sloppy job copying configs etc from the s390x
fips animals and forgot about the OS versions, branches, etc. Peter
Eisentraut reminded me I think I cleaned that all up.

Regards,
Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-02-15 16:57:40 Re: New buildfarm animals with FIPS mode enabled
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2025-02-15 16:55:12 Re: pg17.3 PQescapeIdentifier() ignores len