Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson
Date: 2021-10-13 23:11:10
Message-ID: bf21fa27-a533-cead-c2c2-181ffdc7b71b@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 10/13/21 5:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-10-13 16:06:32 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> If you prep a patch I'll test it.
> Well, right now I'm wondering if the better fix is to just remove the whole
> win32 block. I don't know how far back, but afaict it's not needed. Seems to
> have been needed for narwhal at some point, according to 02b61dd08f99. But
> narwhal is long dead.
>
Ok, I'll test it out.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2021-10-13 23:45:39 Re: should we allow users with a predefined role to access pg_backend_memory_contexts view and pg_log_backend_memory_contexts function?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-10-13 22:58:32 Re: GIN pending list cleanup during autoanalyze blocks cleanup by VACUUM