Re: snapbuild woes

On 13/04/17 07:02, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> On April 12, 2017 9:58:12 PM PDT, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:21:51AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> On 2017-04-12 11:03:57 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> On 4/12/17 02:31, Noah Misch wrote:
>>>>>>> But I hope you mean to commit these snapbuild patches before
>> the postgres 10
>>>>>>> release? As far as I know, logical replication is still very
>> broken without
>>>>>>> them (or at least some of that set of 5 patches - I don't know
>> which ones
>>>>>>> are essential and which may not be).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, these should go into 10 *and* earlier releases, and I don't
>> plan to
>>>>>> wait for 2017-07.
>>>>>
>>>>> [Action required within three days. This is a generic
>> notification.]
>>>>
>>>> I'm hoping for a word from Andres on this.
>>>
>>> Feel free to reassign to me.
>>
>> Thanks for volunteering; I'll do that shortly. Please observe the
>> policy on
>> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar
>> days of
>> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
>
> Will, volunteering might be the wrong word. These ate all my fault, although none look v10 specific.
>

Yeah none of this is v10 specific, the importance to v10 is that it
affects the logical replication in core, not just extensions like in
9.4-9.6.

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services