Re: empty set

From: "Aaron Bono" <postgresql(at)aranya(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: empty set
Date: 2006-06-09 04:47:16
Message-ID: bf05e51c0606082147o41d5d4fdu2c69113464ae85aa@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

That will work if foo is never NULL. If foo takes on a NULL value you will
get those records where it is NULL.

Is there a reason you cannot do an if/else statement on the list size? That
is what I do on my queries.

-Aaron

On 6/8/06, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 16:40, CG wrote:
> > PostgreSQL 8.1
> >
> > I've been trying to write a SQL prepare routine. One of the challenging
> > elements I'm running into is an empty set ...
> >
> > "select foo from bar where foo in ? ;"
> >
> > What if "?" is an set with zero elements? What is the proper value to
> use to
> > replace "?" indicating an empty set?
>
> NULL?
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2006-06-09 07:33:56 Re: empty set
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-06-08 23:09:33 Re: pgxml & xpath_table