| From: | Thomas Güttler <guettliml(at)thomas-guettler(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? |
| Date: | 2017-04-30 11:37:02 |
| Message-ID: | beaf38ba-294b-fa6b-3250-4ade59180c66@thomas-guettler.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Is is possible that PostgreSQL will replace these building blocks in the future?
- redis (Caching)
- rabbitmq (amqp)
- s3 (Blob storage)
One question is "is it possible?", then next "is it feasible?"
I think it would be great if I could use PG only and if I could
avoid the other types of servers.
The benefit is not very obvious on the first sight. I think it will saves you
time, money and energy only in the long run.
What do you think?
Regards,
Thomas Güttler
--
I am looking for feedback for my personal programming guidelines:
https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Delrue | 2017-04-30 13:39:05 | Re: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2017-04-29 01:53:31 | Re: query planner placement of sort/limit w.r.t. joins |