From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Srinath Reddy <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall |
Date: | 2025-03-11 20:16:26 |
Message-ID: | be953889-ba0f-4b4e-8a7c-ec03cbf270b2@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-03-11 Tu 1:52 PM, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 2025-Mar-11, Mahendra Singh Thalor wrote:
>>
>>> In map.dat file, I tried to fix this issue by adding number of characters
>>> in dbname but as per code comments, as of now, we are not supporting \n\r
>>> in dbnames so i removed handling.
>>> I will do some more study to fix this issue.
>> Yeah, I think this is saying that you should not consider the contents
>> of map.dat as a shell string. After all, you're not going to _execute_
>> that file via the shell.
>>
>> Maybe for map.dat you need to escape such characters somehow, so that
>> they don't appear as literal newlines/carriage returns.
> I haven't looked at the code for this, but why are we inventing an
> ad-hoc file format? Why not use JSON, like we do for backup manifests?
> Then storing arbitrary database names won't be a problem.
>
I'm not sure everyone thinks that was a good idea for backup manifests
(in fact I know some don't), and it seems somewhat like overkill for a
simple map of oids to database names.
cheers
andrew
>
>
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marcos Pegoraro | 2025-03-11 20:18:28 | Re: Document NULL |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2025-03-11 19:47:05 | Re: Document NULL |