From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "'Simon Riggs'" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction |
Date: | 2019-04-05 01:30:32 |
Message-ID: | be25cadf-982e-3f01-88b4-443a6667e16a@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019/04/05 5:42, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-04-04 06:58, Amit Langote wrote:
>> Also, since the "speed up partition planning" patch went in (428b260f8),
>> it might be possible to see the performance boost even with the
>> partitioning example you cited upthread.
>
> I can't detect any performance improvement with the patch applied to
> current master, using the test case from Yoshikazu Imai (2019-03-19).
I was able to detect it as follows.
* partitioned table setup:
$ cat ht.sql
drop table ht cascade;
create table ht (a int primary key, b int, c int) partition by hash (a);
select 'create table ht' || x::text || ' partition of ht for values with
(modulus 8192, remainder ' || (x)::text || ');' from generate_series(0,
8191) x;
\gexec
* pgbench script:
$ cat select.sql
\set param random(1, 8192)
select * from ht where a = :param
* pgbench (5 minute run with -M prepared)
pgbench -n -M prepared -T 300 -f select.sql
* tps:
plan_cache_mode = auto
HEAD: 1915 tps
Patched: 2394 tps
plan_cache_mode = custom (non-problematic: generic plan is never created)
HEAD: 2402 tps
Patched: 2393 tps
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2019-04-05 01:30:52 | Re: Server Crash due to assertion failure in _bt_check_unique() |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-04-05 01:17:14 | Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing |