From: | "emergency(dot)shower(at)gmail(dot)com" <emergency(dot)shower(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Timestamp weirdness |
Date: | 2005-07-25 22:02:16 |
Message-ID: | bdf1a0980507251502f4b68af@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 7/25/05, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> [...]
> The difficulty with both 2 and 3 is that the driver has no very good way
> of knowing whether it's writing to a timestamp with tz or one without.
> We can know the parameter datatype we send, but if that gets converted
> to the other type within the server, you're going to get burnt.
If I TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE is implemented on the server as a
(timestamp, time zone)-pair, the server should be able to cast
TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE correctly to TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE as
described in the SQL standard:
From TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE to TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE
TargetValue = SourceValue.UTC + SourceValue.TimeZone
This cast is something like a conversion from a instance in time to a
local time representation.
In this case I would propose to send (if possible) timestamp and time
zone to the server, no matter if we'll write a TIMESTAMP WITH TIME
ZONE or a TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE value. We could have some hope
to get correct results then.
Regards,
Alex
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | emergency.shower@gmail.com | 2005-07-25 22:51:58 | Re: Timestamp Summary |
Previous Message | Dennis Gesker | 2005-07-25 21:18:55 | Re: JdbcRowSet Problem |