From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reducing excess files in pg_xlog |
Date: | 2010-03-22 14:36:10 |
Message-ID: | bddc86151003220736g230c54een81a7741030e690ce@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 22 March 2010 14:29, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On 22 March 2010 14:19, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Force a checkpoint, if one hasn't happened already.
>
> > Yeah, I've run a CHECKPOINT too, but no joy. Still the same number of
> > files.
>
> Hm, it works for me. What PG version is this exactly? Are you sure
> the active value of checkpoint_segments really changed? (Use SHOW)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
This is version 8.4.3
postgres=# show checkpoint_segments;
checkpoint_segments
---------------------
3
(1 row)
Not sure if it's of any relevance, but the file name sequence seems to go a
bit weird.
Nov 25 19:49 0000000100000000000000FA
Nov 26 17:25 0000000100000000000000FB
Dec 16 14:50 0000000100000000000000FC
Dec 17 04:00 0000000100000000000000FD
Dec 17 15:26 0000000100000000000000FE
Dec 17 15:27 000000010000000100000000
Dec 17 15:29 000000010000000100000001
Mar 22 14:28 0000000100000000000000BF
And yes, this particular cluster has very low usage at the moment.
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Carsten Kropf | 2010-03-22 15:15:17 | Re: Determining the OID of a certain type |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-22 14:29:24 | Re: Reducing excess files in pg_xlog |