From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | webmaster <webmaster(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-12-3 |
Date: | 2009-12-03 14:23:39 |
Message-ID: | bddc86150912030623q39250a2dj7c6e1401a42d501a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
2009/12/3 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:00 PM, <webmaster(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> > PostgreSQL.org moderation report - 2009-12-3 14:0:1.
> >
> > There are 6 documentation comment(s) requiring moderation.
> > There are 7 event(s) requiring moderation.
> > There are 5 news item(s) requiring moderation.
> > There are 5 professional service(s) requiring moderation.
> >
> > Moderators; please check and moderate these items as soon as possible!
>
> I'm getting somewhat tired of asking this. Who is moderating at the
> moment? Should I assume that everyone has quit?
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
> --
>
Isn't there a single list of moderators available? I would have thought
that if anyone isn't able to moderate anymore, they should be removed. This
would allow assessment of the list size to determine whether others need to
be sought to moderate in their stead.
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-12-03 14:39:53 | Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-12-3 |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-12-03 14:02:49 | Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-12-3 |