From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] UKPUG and using the PUGs site |
Date: | 2009-10-20 10:15:22 |
Message-ID: | bddc86150910200315m61c2bb7dg2d098fbbcb537d0@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
2009/10/20 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> This may sound like a dumb idea, but how about registering community
>> members by location and showing them as markers on a Google Map? We
>> could get a clearer idea of user distribution then.
>
> 'Community members' are a small subset of 'users', which is the
> problem. We know who the community members are, but not most of the
> users.
Yes, I see what you mean. In that case I guess it's not worth it.
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-10-20 11:35:57 | Re: [pgsql-www] UKPUG and using the PUGs site |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-10-20 09:51:16 | Re: [pgsql-www] UKPUG and using the PUGs site |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-10-20 11:35:57 | Re: [pgsql-www] UKPUG and using the PUGs site |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-10-20 09:51:16 | Re: [pgsql-www] UKPUG and using the PUGs site |