From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: vacuumdb error |
Date: | 2009-10-16 12:28:03 |
Message-ID: | bddc86150910160528o4b92d54bp2e56de40a61f3228@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
2009/10/16 Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> This is either a bug in vacuumdb with it not using the correct order,
>> or postgres shouldn't be paying attention to the order of the
>> keywords. In any case, it doesn't work. I've searched the postgres
>> FAQs, TODO and mailing list archives, but can't find a mention of
>> this.
>
> Thanks, fixed. We had the same bug with FREEZE and ANALYZE combination,
> which was fixed in April, but the order between FREEZE and VERBOSE was
> still incorrect.
>
> --
> Heikki Linnakangas
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
Thanks Heikki. You probably already know, but remember to prevent it
using FREEZE at all for 8.5+ as according to the documentation it's
being deprecated.
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-10-16 12:40:24 | Re: vacuumdb error |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-10-16 10:39:09 | Re: vacuumdb error |