From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Warm standby failover mechanism |
Date: | 2009-02-25 09:26:26 |
Message-ID: | bddc86150902250126y3cc463a4o3102e283ac659bb7@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks for the link Simon, but this doesn't recommend any method for
triggering failover, or telling the primary that another server is now
primary.
We've set up a primary server in archive mode to continuously archive to an
NFS mount, and the standby server to continuously recovery from that
directory (although I'm not sure that's actually working... I've probably
overlooked something). The problem we face is working out how to tell the
standby server that it is the primary. Yes this can be done with a trigger
file in /tmp, but how would that automatically appear there? And when the
failed server actually restarted, or the Postgres service restarts, how do
we tell it that it is no longer the primary?
Thanks
Thom
2009/2/24 Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 16:55 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
>
> > We're looking at setting up a warm-standby server using log shipping
> > and aren't too sure about how we should trigger failover. Is there a
> > commonly-used approach which is reliable enough to recommend? Looking
> > at the documentation, there doesn't seem to be any recommendation. I
> > preferrably don't want to use a witness server.
> >
> > Also, what would you say is the best way to tell the failed primary
> > server that it is no longer the primary server?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/pgstandby.html
>
> --
> Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
> PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo | 2009-02-25 09:32:08 | Re: where to divide application and database |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-02-25 08:40:27 | Re: speaking of 8.4... |