From: | "Thom Brown" <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SHMMAX and shared_bufffers |
Date: | 2008-11-11 17:07:12 |
Message-ID: | bddc86150811110907g365d56d5ucaaed56126f205ea@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Actually, I think I may have solved it, but I would like someone to verify it.
The temp_buffers takes up 8MB which suggests that needs to be taken
into account, so 256MB - 8MB = 248MB.
Is this right?
Thanks
Thom
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that if I set my SHMMAX to 256 * 1024 * 1024 (268435456)
> and my shared_buffers value in postgresql.conf to 256MB the server
> fails to start. I managed to find a tipping point: 249MB seems to be
> too much and 248MB seems to be okay.
>
> Could someone explain what I'm missing here? I thought the
> shared_buffers could be anything up to SHMMAX?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Thom
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-11-11 17:17:20 | Re: SHMMAX and shared_bufffers |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2008-11-11 16:57:10 | SHMMAX and shared_bufffers |