Group by clause - Postgres 9.2.4

From: Khangelani Gama <kgama(at)argility(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Group by clause - Postgres 9.2.4
Date: 2014-12-09 11:18:43
Message-ID: bd7792db57721722bc94664c4ba2a7e8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

I need some help

I was given the SQL called as insert into usr_role (select usr_id,
'501~734' from usr_role where role_id = '501~703' group by usr_id); to be
run in a server which will work fine but I need to construct another one to
work the same way for the master table called corp_usr_role. Given the
following 2 tables, is it correct to have the SQL as insert into
corp_usr_role (select usr_id,ctry_cde,grp_cde, '501~734' from
corp_usr_role where role_id = '501~703' group by
usr_id,ctry_cde,grp_cde,role_id);

*First table :*

*Table "public.corp_usr_role"*

Column | Type | Modifiers

----------+------+-----------

ctry_cde | text | not null

grp_cde | text | not null

usr_id | text | not null

role_id | text | not null

Indexes:

"pk_cur" PRIMARY KEY, btree (ctry_cde, grp_cde, usr_id, role_id)

*2nd table : *

*Table "public.usr_role"*

Column | Type | Modifiers

---------+------+-----------

usr_id | text |

role_id | text |

Indexes:

"idx_usr_role_role" btree (role_id)

"idx_usr_role_usr" btree (usr_id)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
The contents of and attachments to this e-mail are intended for the addressee only, and may contain the confidential
information of Argility (Proprietary) Limited and/or its subsidiaries. Any review, use or dissemination thereof by anyone
other than the intended addressee is prohibited.If you are not the intended addressee please notify the writer immediately
and destroy the e-mail. Argility (Proprietary) Limited and its subsidiaries distance themselves from and accept no liability
for unauthorised use of their e-mail facilities or e-mails sent other than strictly for business purposes.

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message john 2014-12-09 13:55:29 Sessions being killed - out of memory?
Previous Message Natalie Wenz 2014-12-08 22:28:19 autovacuum to prevent wraparound question