Re: Join Correlation Name

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Join Correlation Name
Date: 2019-10-29 11:05:29
Message-ID: bd60fa63-99ab-36a8-5b88-58e0a7162052@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-10-29 11:47, Vik Fearing wrote:
> When joining tables with USING, the listed columns are merged and no
> longer belong to either the left or the right side.  That means they can
> no longer be qualified which can often be an inconvenience.
>
>
> SELECT a.x, b.y, z FROM a INNER JOIN b USING (z);
>
>
> The SQL standard provides a workaround for this by allowing an alias on
> the join clause. (<join correlation name> in section 7.10)
>
>
> SELECT j.x, j.y, j.z FROM a INNER JOIN b USING (z) AS j;
>
>
> Attached is a patch (based on 517bf2d910) adding this feature.

Is this the same as https://commitfest.postgresql.org/25/2158/ ?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Isaac Morland 2019-10-29 11:24:28 Re: Join Correlation Name
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2019-10-29 10:50:01 Re: Problem with synchronous replication