From: | jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Speed while runnning large transactions. |
Date: | 2009-09-24 11:35:48 |
Message-ID: | bd3db7f8f1e1d041b815cc27ea2f6582.squirrel@shrek.krogh.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:27 AM, <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have a transaction running at the database for around 20 hours ..
>> still
>> isn't done. But during the last hours it has come to the point where it
>> really hurts performance of "other queries".
>
> What is your transaction doing during this time?
It is a massive DB-update affecting probably 1.000.000 records with a lot
of roundtrips to the update-application during that.
>> Given pg_stat_activity output there seems to be no locks interfering but
>> the overall cpu-usage of all queries continue to rise. iowait numbers
>> are
>> also very low.
>
> What does
> select count(*) from pg_stat_activity where waiting;
> say?
There is no "particular query". No indication of locks it just seems that
having the transaction open (with a lot of changes hold in it) has an
impact on the general performance. Even without touching the same records.
>> What can I do to make the system handle other queries better?
>
> Really kinda depends on what your transaction is doing.
insert's, updates, delete..
--
Jesper
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jesper | 2009-09-24 11:39:30 | Re: Speed while runnning large transactions. |
Previous Message | tv | 2009-09-24 09:56:12 | Re: Slow query after upgrade to 8.4 |