From: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUG] Failed Assertion in ReorderBufferChangeMemoryUpdate() |
Date: | 2021-09-13 06:34:44 |
Message-ID: | bd102773-1a0b-1562-b2d6-2044bb839354@amazon.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 9/9/21 3:16 PM, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/9/21 1:16 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:02 PM Drouvot, Bertrand
>> <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 9/7/21 9:11 AM, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>>> Please find enclosed patch v2 (for the master branch) implementing the
>>> modified approach of option 2) proposed by Amit.
>>>
>> The patch looks good to me. I have made a minor modification in the
>> comment to make it explicit why we are not subtracting the size
>> immediately
>
> Thanks!
>
> Indeed, good point to also mention in the comment why it has been done
> that way.
>
>> Kindly prepare back-branch patches and
>> test the same.
>
> Please find enclosed the modified (and tested) version for the
> REL_13_STABLE branch (the master patch version also applied on
> REL_14_STABLE).
>
I've seen that the patches have been committed, thanks!
I'm marking the corresponding CF entry as committed.
Thanks
Bertrand
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2021-09-13 06:45:04 | Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2021-09-13 06:19:39 | Re: brin multi minmax crash for inet value |