Re: [BUG] Failed Assertion in ReorderBufferChangeMemoryUpdate()

From: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Failed Assertion in ReorderBufferChangeMemoryUpdate()
Date: 2021-09-13 06:34:44
Message-ID: bd102773-1a0b-1562-b2d6-2044bb839354@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 9/9/21 3:16 PM, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/9/21 1:16 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:02 PM Drouvot, Bertrand
>> <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 9/7/21 9:11 AM, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>>> Please find enclosed patch v2 (for the master branch) implementing the
>>> modified approach of option 2) proposed by Amit.
>>>
>> The patch looks good to me. I have made a minor modification in the
>> comment to make it explicit why we are not subtracting the size
>> immediately
>
> Thanks!
>
> Indeed, good point to also mention in the comment why it has been done
> that way.
>
>> Kindly prepare back-branch patches and
>> test the same.
>
> Please find enclosed the modified (and tested) version for the
> REL_13_STABLE branch (the master patch version also applied on
> REL_14_STABLE).
>
I've seen that the patches have been committed, thanks!

I'm marking the corresponding CF entry as committed.

Thanks

Bertrand

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2021-09-13 06:45:04 Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2021-09-13 06:19:39 Re: brin multi minmax crash for inet value