Re: Table Partitions / Partial Indexes

From: Mike C <smith(dot)not(dot)western(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table Partitions / Partial Indexes
Date: 2005-12-12 02:49:10
Message-ID: bd0eabd0512111849q4b967bf0scb14d1b47993a370@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 12/12/05, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Mike C <smith(dot)not(dot)western(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > CLUSTER on PC_TRAFFIC_IDX3 gives me significantly improved performance:
>
> How can you tell? Neither of these are EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.
>
> regards, tom lane

Sorry that's a result of my bad record keeping. I've been keeping records of
the explain but not the analyze. IIRC the times dropped from ~25 seconds
down to ~8 seconds (using analyze).

Regards,

Mike

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Turner 2005-12-12 04:45:51 Re: Is RAID10 the best choice?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-12 02:39:08 Re: Table Partitions / Partial Indexes