Re: Add on_error and log_verbosity options to file_fdw

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add on_error and log_verbosity options to file_fdw
Date: 2024-10-03 09:03:48
Message-ID: bcfda343-69bb-4973-b95e-99f4ed9f49e2@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024/10/03 13:23, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 11:34 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2024/10/02 9:27, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> Sorry for being late in joining the review of this patch. Both 0001
>>> and 0003 look good to me. I have two comments on the 0002 patch:
>>
>> Thanks for the review!
>>
>>> I think that while scanning a file_fdw foreign table with
>>> log_verbosity='silent' the query is not interruptible.
>>
>> You're right. I added CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in the retry loop.
>>
>>> Also, we don't switch to the per-tuple memory context when retrying
>>> due to a soft error. I'm not sure it's okay as in CopyFrom(), a
>>> similar function for COPY command, we switch to the per-tuple memory
>>> context every time before parsing an input line. Would it be
>>> problematic if we switch to another memory context while parsing an
>>> input line? In CopyFrom() we also call ResetPerTupleExprContext() and
>>> ExecClearTuple() for every input, so we might want to consider calling
>>> them for every input.
>>
>> Yes, I've updated the patch based on your comment.
>> Could you please review the latest version?
>
> Thank you for updating the patch! All patches look good to me.

Thanks for the review! Pushed.

BTW, regarding the issue I mentioned earlier about file_fdw not reporting
the number of tuples processed and skipped in the pg_stat_progress_copy view,
I'll start a new thread to discuss this further.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2024-10-03 09:11:14 Re: Return pg_control from pg_backup_stop().
Previous Message Maiquel Grassi 2024-10-03 08:39:01 RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+