From: | William Leite Araújo <william(dot)bh(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "paallen(at)attglobal(dot)net" <paallen(at)attglobal(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Update 3 columns w/ 1 function calc 3 values? |
Date: | 2006-10-03 15:19:19 |
Message-ID: | bc63ad820610030819p35ea8ad1tad2431771b14fd8c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
2006/10/3, paallen(at)attglobal(dot)net <paallen(at)attglobal(dot)net>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am moving some of my old MS Access functions to
> plpgsql.
>
> My function was made to return coordinates, X,Y,Z
> for a point along a curved line. So it is not the
> fastest of functions because it has to call and
> query data from 3 different tables. I used to
> just create 3 wrapper functions for my main
> function which would return the x, y, and z values
> seperately but that requires the main function to
> be called 3 seperate times. So here is my bottle
> neck. Of course I need to update +50,000 records.
>
> What should I do to speed this up. What is the
> best way to update 3 columns from one function
> call.
It's realy very hard say something without the involving tables schema.
You can:
- change the function to return x,y,z in one call only ?
- join the tables?
- what is the function language?
In MSACCESS I once rig the function to
> cycle through the records with a curser but that
> was slow and would crap out due to the shear number.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil
>
--
William Leite Araújo
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | chrisj | 2006-10-03 15:45:55 | Re: Assigning a timestamp without timezone to a timestamp |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2006-10-03 14:59:58 | Re: SEQUENCES |