Re: DOCS: pg_createsubscriber wrong link?

From: Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DOCS: pg_createsubscriber wrong link?
Date: 2024-12-16 15:42:07
Message-ID: bb90fc3a-141a-4244-9def-e265034f0a56@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16.12.2024 13:56, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:58 AM Peter Smith<smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> While reviewing the pg_createsubscriber [1] docs I found a potentially
>> wrong linkend.
>>
>> This sentence:
>> "For smaller databases, initial data synchronization is recommended."
>>
>> links to [2] ("29.4.5. Initial Data Synchronization").
>>
>> This seems to have been deliberately changed (commit [3])
>>
> Yeah, the change made by commit 84db9a0eb1 is wrong and your latest
> patch in this thread looks good to me. I am adding Daniel and the
> original author to see if they think differently.

It looks like my mistake.
I missed that "Initial Data Synchronization" section is a subsection
of "Row filters". There is no hidden reason other than matching
the link name with the subsection name and my inattention.

v2 of proposed patch looks good to me.

--
Pavel Luzanov
Postgres Professional:https://postgrespro.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2024-12-16 16:07:18 Re: Count and log pages set all-frozen by vacuum
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2024-12-16 15:42:04 Re: per backend I/O statistics