Re: Array initialisation notation in syscache.c

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Array initialisation notation in syscache.c
Date: 2022-12-21 16:36:34
Message-ID: babaf666-eaf6-e376-815c-87b9d636a12d@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21.12.22 04:16, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:33 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> KEY(Anum_pg_attribute_attrelid,
>> Anum_pg_attribute_attnum),
>
> I independently rediscovered that our VA_ARGS_NARGS() macro in c.h
> always returns 1 on MSVC via trial-by-CI. Derp. Here is the same
> patch, no change from v2, but this time accompanied by Victor Spirin's
> fix, which I found via one of the tab-completion-is-busted-on-Windows
> discussions. I can't supply a useful commit message, because I
> haven't understood why it works, but it does indeed seem to work and
> this should make cfbot green.

This looks like a good improvement to me.

(I have also thought about having this generated from the catalog
definition files somehow, but one step at a time ...)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2022-12-21 17:21:51 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-12-21 15:33:35 Re: float4in_internal