| From: | seunosewa(at)inaira(dot)com (Seun Osewa) |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL |
| Date: | 2003-10-10 06:17:52 |
| Message-ID: | ba87a3cf.0310092217.72098544@posting.google.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
dwolt(at)iserv(dot)net (Dawn M. Wolthuis) wrote in message news:<6db906b2(dot)0310091212(dot)4f967cf5(at)posting(dot)google(dot)com>...
> I would suggest ditching the entire relational model (as both overly
> simplistic in its theory and overly complex in its implementation) and
> start with English (that is one of the other names for the GIRLS
> language). Note that language is also the starting point for putting
> data in XML documents, but it sure doesn't seem to be the starting
> point for XQuery, eh?
>
> --dawn
> Dawn M. Wolthuis
> www.tincat-group.com
Please explain further. What do you really mean? Its natural for
everyone here to think every word in that post was a troll unless you
explain your views more clearly. You could not have expressed a more
unpopular/unsupportable combination of ideas! Exactly how would we go
about using language as a query tool? Is this AI? What would the
underlying model be knowing how redundant and imprecise language can
be? Tell what we may have missed.
Seun Osewa
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-10-10 07:36:56 | 7.4beta4 compile failure on NetBSD |
| Previous Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2003-10-10 05:47:35 | Re: 2-phase commit |