From: | Seref Arikan <serefarikan(at)kurumsalteknoloji(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Help request to improve function performance |
Date: | 2009-04-23 08:44:53 |
Message-ID: | ba5fbf730904230144u3b24cb73p7783c41478094863@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Scott,
I agree, and I am doing the entity attribute model because I simply have to.
This table is used to persist data that is hold in user defined information
models. Kind of a domain specific language. The users continously create
these hierarchical structures, so neither the amount of them, nor their
structure is stable. On top of that, these structures can have quite deep
hieararchies, with collections, references to other structures etc.. This
forces almost everyone working in the domain to end up in this db model. In
case you are curious and have a lot of time at your hands, you can visit
www.openehr.org to see what I'm talking about. The specifications part have
all the documents one can need.
I have worked with very capable DBAs before, and even though it has been
quite some time since I've done real DB work, I would like to invest in
postgresql as much as I can, to make the total framework faster. Therefore,
all suggestions are welcommed.
All the best
Seref
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> 2009/4/22 Seref Arikan <serefarikan(at)kurumsalteknoloji(dot)com>:
> > Hi Filip,
> > First of all: thanks a lot for your kind response. Here is the create
> script
> > for my schema:
> >
> > CREATE TABLE "app"."archetype_data" (
> > "id" BIGINT NOT NULL,
> > "context_id" VARCHAR(1000),
> > "archetype_name" VARCHAR(1000),
> > "archetype_path" VARCHAR(1000),
> > "name" VARCHAR(1000),
> > "value_string" VARCHAR(1000),
> > "value_int" BIGINT,
> > "value_double" DOUBLE PRECISION,
> > "session_id" VARCHAR(1000),
> > "instance_index" INTEGER,
> > CONSTRAINT "archetype_data_pkey" PRIMARY KEY("id")
> > ) WITHOUT OIDS;
>
> If I'm not mistaken, you're doing Entity Attribute Value model type
> storage. I.e. a database in a database. Makes for easy coding, and
> danged near impossible to troubleshoot your data.
>
> It's a religious issue but I come down on the side that good data
> modelling is hard for a reason, because it pays you back so much in
> the end.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Filip Rembiałkowski | 2009-04-23 08:57:43 | Re: Help request to improve function performance |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2009-04-23 07:23:14 | Re: Web + Slicing/Paging datas |