From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | jameschancojr87(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "68.4. Visibility Map" change suggestion. |
Date: | 2021-04-27 09:28:37 |
Message-ID: | ba4bf492f1cf75934dc8eec3aab5cdcc4ed22bc2.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 21:55 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/storage-vm.html
> Description:
>
> Currently the documentation lists the line below;
>
> `Each heap relation has a Visibility Map (VM) to keep track of which pages
> contain only tuples that are known to be visible to all active
> transactions;`
>
> Should it instead read like;
>
> `Each heap relation has a Visibility Map (VM) to keep track of only those
> pages that contain tuples known to be visible to all active transactions;`
>
> After reading through the documentation and reading the first line, I first
> thought that VM only kept track of pages that only had visible tuples.
> Instead my understanding is that it shows which pages have any visible
> tuples in them.
I think that the wording of the documentation is more correct.
The VM also tracks the pages that are not all-visible. They have the
corresponding bit set to 0.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2021-04-27 14:26:48 | Clarify how triggers relate to transactions |
Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2021-04-26 21:55:25 | "68.4. Visibility Map" change suggestion. |