From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Shantanu Shekhar <shekharshan(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sequence generating negative numbers |
Date: | 2020-08-19 22:28:25 |
Message-ID: | ba22e923-4aae-30c9-bd2e-12fa1437d7d5@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/19/20 3:24 PM, Shantanu Shekhar wrote:
Please reply to list also.
Ccing list.
> Thanks Adrian,
>
> I will reach out to the ORM team and see if they can help me understand
> this behavior.
I should have asked earlier, is this sequence set as a DEFAULT on the PK
field or is it just being used by code to get numbers?
>
> Shantanu
> On Wednesday, August 19, 2020, 06:20:27 PM EDT, Adrian Klaver
> <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On 8/19/20 3:15 PM, Shantanu Shekhar wrote:
> > Team,
> >
> > I have a sequence definition in Postgres 9.6.11 like so:
> >
> > CREATE SEQUENCE IF NOT EXISTS org.my_seq
> > INCREMENT 1
> > MINVALUE 1
> > NO MAXVALUE
> > START 1
> > CACHE 20;
> >
> > This sequence is used by a Java ORM framework to generate primary keys
> > for one of our tables. The initial numbers generated by this sequence
> > are as shown below:
> >
> > -28 -27 -26 -25 -8 -7 1 2 52 53 72 92 93 94 112 113 132 133 152 172 192
> > 193 212
> >
> > I am unable to understand why the sequence would start with a negative
> > number, particularly when the definition explicitly asks the sequence to
> > start at 1. This has happened consistently in all of our environments.
>
> Because something in the ORM is generating negative numbers and
> supplying then directly to the PK field.
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Shantanu
>
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
>
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Sjøgren | 2020-08-20 08:23:03 | Re: Database logins taking longer and longer, showing up as "authentication" in ps(1) |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2020-08-19 22:24:12 | Re: Understanding EXPLAIN ANALYZE estimates when loops != 1 |