From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: automatically generating node support functions |
Date: | 2022-07-08 12:44:00 |
Message-ID: | b9acf63c-6693-d87c-f010-ca8ad502a39f@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06.07.22 22:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> [ v7-0001-Automatically-generate-node-support-functions.patch ]
>
> I have gone through this and made some proposed changes (attached),
I have included those.
> and I think it is almost committable. There is one nasty problem
> we need a solution to, which is that pgindent is not at all on board
> with this idea of attaching node attrs to typedefs. It pushes them
> to the next line, like this:
>
> @@ -691,7 +709,8 @@
> (rel)->reloptkind == RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL || \
> (rel)->reloptkind == RELOPT_OTHER_UPPER_REL)
>
> -typedef struct RelOptInfo pg_node_attr(no_copy_equal, no_read)
> +typedef struct RelOptInfo
> +pg_node_attr(no_copy_equal, no_read)
> {
> NodeTag type;
I have found that putting the attributes at the end of the struct
definition, right before the semicolon, works, so I have changed it that
way. (This is also where a gcc __attribute__() would go, so it seems
reasonable.)
The attached patch is stable under pgindent.
Finally, I have updated src/backend/nodes/README a bit.
I realize I've been confused various times about when a catversion
change is required when changing nodes. (I think the bump in 251154bebe
was probably not needed.) I have tried to put that in the README. This
could perhaps be expanded.
I think for this present patch, I would do a catversion bump, just to be
sure, in case some of the printed node fields are different now.
It was also my plan to remove the #ifdef OBSOLETE sections in a separate
commit right after, just to be clear.
Final thoughts?
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v8-0001-Automatically-generate-node-support-functions.patch | text/plain | 107.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-07-08 12:56:14 | Re: Backup command and functions can cause assertion failure and segmentation fault |
Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-07-08 12:24:13 | Re: Patch proposal: New hooks in the connection path |