| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steven Pousty <steve(dot)pousty(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
| Date: | 2020-04-27 13:17:23 |
| Message-ID: | b998a672-2525-1cba-ac64-b292f495919e@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/27/20 8:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> Great. I do want to do a bit more desultory testing in the older
>> versions of the docs, but it can be committed whenever the -docs side is
>> ready.
>
> Other than that point, the main.css patch as I presented it just adds
> some rules that aren't used yet, so it could be pushed as soon as you're
> satisfied about the !important change. It'd probably make sense to
> push it in advance of making the markup changes, so we don't have an
> interval of near-unreadable devel docs.
*nods* I'll ensure to test again and hopefully commit later today.
I forget what I was looking at, but I did see a similar pattern in some
other modern software docs, so it seems like this is trending in the
right direction. Looking forward to the rollout!
Jonathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Prabhat Sahu | 2020-04-27 13:48:04 | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-27 12:49:41 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |