Re: Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

From: Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Mohan, Ross" <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Date: 2005-04-27 00:42:10
Message-ID: b918cf3d0504261742d98c75@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 4/26/05, Mohan, Ross <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com> wrote:
> Maybe he needs to spend $7K on performance improvements?
>
> ;-)
>

AAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!

I will forever hate the number 7,000 from this day forth!

Seriously, though, I've never seen a thread on any list wander on so
aimlessly for so long.

Please, mommy, make it stop!

--
Mike Rylander
mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com
GPLS -- PINES Development
Database Developer
http://open-ils.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Brown 2005-04-27 02:46:52 Re: Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2005-04-27 00:16:32 Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?