Re: WAL/pg_xlog on Another Disk: Redundancy?

From: Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Thomas F(dot)O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>
Cc: PgSql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL/pg_xlog on Another Disk: Redundancy?
Date: 2004-12-16 01:52:34
Message-ID: b918cf3d041215175264092591@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:38:45 -0600, Thomas F.O'Connell <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> wrote:

[snip]

> Would a more ideal setup be a six-drive server with a RAID 1+0 on four
> drives with 2 drives dedicated to WAL that mirrored one another? Is
> that overkill? Anyone have recommendations for an appropriate setup for
> a 5-bay server?

A six drive setup would be great. You definitly want some protection
for the WAL data. I've seen up to a 20% increase on write-heavy
servers after moving pg_xlog to it's own disk.

>
> Thanks!
>
> -tfo
>
> --
> Thomas F. O'Connell
> Co-Founder, Information Architect
> Sitening, LLC
> http://www.sitening.com/
> 110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6
> Nashville, TN 37203-6320
> 615-260-0005
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>

--
Mike Rylander
mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com
GPLS -- PINES Development
Database Developer
http://open-ils.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Wittber 2004-12-16 03:04:34 Debian Packages for Postgresql 8.0.0 RC1
Previous Message Paul Tillotson 2004-12-16 00:54:57 Re: Performance suggestions?