From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New 'pg' consolidated metacommand patch |
Date: | 2020-05-28 06:39:55 |
Message-ID: | b90e41c9-f2e8-cd39-20d1-760c38ced6e0@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-05-27 23:42, Christopher Browne wrote:
> d) systemd is a Controversial System; the folk that seem particularly
> irate about it seem to be "Old Bearded Sysadmins" that hate the idea of
> redoing their understandings of how Unix systems initialize. Personally,
> my feelings are ambivalent; I'm using it where I find some use, and have
> not been displeased with my results. And since modern systems now have
> USB and network devices added and dropped on a whim, there's a critical
> need for something newer with more dynamic responses than old SysV
> Init. But I certainly "get" that some aren't so happy with it, and I'm
> not thrilled at the ongoing scope creep that never seems to end.
It is worth noting that systemd did not go for a one-binary-for-all
approach. It has different binaries for different parts of the
functionality. systemctl for controlling services, journalctl for
controlling the journal, etc. Just as a data point to show that there
is no single "new" way to do things.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-05-28 06:44:26 | Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size comment in postgresql.conf |
Previous Message | Jiří Fejfar | 2020-05-28 06:14:05 | Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20? |