Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?

On 6/10/23 09:57, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 15:51 David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
> <mailto:david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>> wrote:
> On 6/9/23 19:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > If you see "rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY && OidIsValid(rte->relid)",
> > it's dead certain that relid refers to a view, so you could just wire
> > in that knowledge.
>
> Yeah, that's a good trick. Even so, I wonder why relkind is not set
> when
> relid is set?
>
> I too have been thinking that setting relkind might be a good idea, even
> if only as a crosscheck that only view relations can look like that in
> the range table.

+1. Even better if we can do it for PG16.

Regards,
-David