From: | "Postgres User" <postgres(dot)developer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Nikolay Moskvichev" <mnv(at)papillon(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Storing blobs in PG DB |
Date: | 2007-04-05 03:38:19 |
Message-ID: | b88c3460704042038wec806dam1f73715ed11e95e5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I recently heard from Josh Berkus that at least one major CMS
application uses Postgres to store entire HTML pages (including image
files) in order to support full versioning.
As a general rule, I prefer not to store BLOBS in a DB- I'd rather
leave the BLOB in the file system and let the db save only a pointer
to it. However, if you need to store BLOBs in a database, Postgres is
one of the better platforms for it.
On 4/3/07, Nikolay Moskvichev <mnv(at)papillon(dot)ru> wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> Question is : How suitable PG for storing about 2 000 000 binary files
> 0,5-2,0 Mb size each ? It is not planned the big number of clients or a
> plenty of updatings. Like photoalbum on local host.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Postgres User | 2007-04-05 03:47:40 | Re: Using MS Access front-end with PG] |
Previous Message | Postgres User | 2007-04-05 03:33:44 | Re: Need your help on using "partion" |